It is often said that someone is his or her “own worst enemy” through counterproductive thoughts and actions. In reading Hamlet thus far, it has become clear that Hamlet –through his constant wavering in character, decision, and relative sanity- serves as the embodiment of this phrase.
Hamlet’s mistakes are mostly due to the fact that he is himself an intellectual and “over-thinks” his circumstances, thereby complicating them. This complication is shown best in Act III Scene III where Hamlet stays his hand in slaying Claudius for the sole reason that Claudius is praying and therefore “seasoned for his passage.” It does not occur to Hamlet that if he were to confront Claudius, an unforgivable vice would soon manifest itself. Hamlet, in this situation, thinks his way out of his responsibilities and leaves with so much haste that he does not hear that Claudius’s repentance was far from sincere (“Words without thoughts never to heaven go”). Moreover, instead of simply gathering sufficient evidence of the king’s guilt and then confronting him quickly, Hamlet desires to know every last piece of information before taking action. His analytical abilities and tireless mind causes him to question and find flaws in everything and therefore, he believes in nothing –including himself. This trait is what sets him apart from Oedipus, who was confident in both his abilities and the righteousness of his cause due to his faith in the gods, since Hamlet at some point doubts everything in his life: love, loyalty, and even instructions from a supernatural realm. Hamlet’s suspicions are what make him so dangerous, as he is able to disconnect from anyone or anything at will –as shown by his sudden and cold detachment from Ophelia, a woman to whom he had consistently sworn his love prior to the start of the play.
Eventually, Hamlet’s charade of insanity gets the better of him. When confronting his mother, Hamlet sees the ghost of his father another time. On this occasion, the ghost is not visible to then other characters and is most likely an illusion that he created in his own mind. Hamlet at this point has lost control, after the doubt he had experienced in the king’s chambers he then switched entirely –not wanting to miss another opportunity deliberating over the circumstances- and strikes out rashly at the figure in the curtain. It is the shock of this act that changes him; he is horrified by his own actions and then at this point allows the insanity to no longer be just an act, but an aspect of his personality (429).
Sunday, February 1, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Schooner,
This is an excellent analysis of Hamlet’s possibly tragic flaw of self-doubt. I completely agree that Hamlet second-guessing everyone and himself is what in the end drives him insane. Great job!
Dear Schooner,
I really liked your blog because it shows how Hamlet can be interpreted a number of ways. When I read this section I had not seen Hamlet in this light, but after reading your blog, I think you may have convinced me! Your portrayal of Hamlet as actually going uncontrollably insane (ex. seeing his father's ghost when no one else can) vs. putting on some sort of front, is something that to me was unclear at times during the play. I think your blog opened my mind and showed me another way in which to interpret this section of the play.
Sincerely,
Jess
Schooner my good man, you have once again captured a very interesting point in your flawless blog. I had never thought about the fact that because Hamlet was second guessing himself and the ghost and over thinking that he might be actually insane. Your points are well defined and you brought to light an interesting point that I had never personally heard made about Hamlet. Well done my old friend
Great job... You raise a very good point about the nature of Hamlet's problems in the play. Perhaps the prince is confronted by incredible challenges, but equally challenging is his own complication of his position. This confounding is of course based upon his own personality, but I think that it is also based upon his emotional state; therefore, Hamlet's loss of control may not really be due to 'insanity,' but due to the consequences of his emotional position.
Schooner,
What a thoughtful blog about Hamlet's sanity, insanity, and various mental states! I can more clearly see now the circle that Hamlet's thoughts take him on: he goes from not trusting anyone to not even trusting himself. Thank you for a good read.
Love,
Mommy
Schooner, I really liked your comments about Hamlet's self doubts and all of your analysis about Hamlet's sanity. Your main point that Hamlet is truly going insane and your use of the ghost was excellent. Nice job.
Schooner,
This was a fantastic blog entry. You made so many good strong points, especially when you prescribed Hamlet's descent into madness as a result of self-doubt.
Great job, dude.
Love,
Raven Scot Kentson
I love this blog Schooner! I find it very interesting that you believe that the second appearance of the ghost is a figment of Hamlet's imagination. I'm not sure I agree with you but I definitely had not thought about it in that way before. Also, I am fascinated by your idea that Hamlet really does go crazy after he kills Polonius. Again, great blog!
Schooner, I'm not sure I agree with your last paragraph, but it makes a strong ending to your blog. What I like even better, though, is your reasoning that too much introspection can be as dangerous to one's balance and ability to decide as too little. Good point.
Post a Comment